September 02 2010 17:03:39
Navigation
· Home
· Discussion Forum
· News Categories
· Staff Page
· Search
· RSS Feeds
· Ultimate Stat Page
· Links
· Contact
· Voice Your Opinion
News Feeds




Welcome
Newspapers vs. Internet

Advert
Opinions Share
By: Daniel Vahab

It makes sense. It’s logical. Why pay for a hard-copy version of your news when you can get it free via the Internet? And the same goes for advertisers: Why pay more to advertise with a hard-copy newspaper than with the online version? The Internet provides endless space for content, and that saves money. There are also no shipping costs, delivery costs, or paper costs. However, this transformation seen in the journalism industry does have a backlash.

Newspapers are sinking everyday. And those who are still afloat are paddling till no end without a life jacket, exhausted and soon to sink. More than budget cuts and staff lay-offs, more than a daily becoming a three-day-a-week, more than morale hitting an all time low, journalistic integrity has sunk too.

As newspapers have attempted to catch up with the speed of the Internet, radio, and syndicated TV news, which offer instant news updates, they have scarified being conscientious and thorough in their reporting.

Newspapers are in survival mode where only the biggest, most known, newspapers should survive. And survival means adapting.

In the Spanish-American War, William Hearst deliberately sensationalized news stories in what became known as "yellow journalism." He did this not only to arouse the American public into wanting war against Cuba, but also to sell more newspapers. What would Hearst do today to save the newspaper industry?

Newspapers could merge. Another solution is niche journalism or focusing on a particular genre. This will at least guarantee a stable readership and might even broaden readership.

In a sense, newspapers already provide niche journalism with "confirmation bias," or only providing information that supports one's bias and not information that goes against one's bias. That does not mean that journalists are lying, just that they are filtering.

Journalists who do this, do so mainly because their incentive is to please their readers. If their newspaper leans conservative, then they feel their stories should reflect conservative views and vice versa. The simplest way this is done is by replacing a weak word for a stronger word such as task for burden.

Joel Kramer, former editor of Minneapolis Star Tribune, proposed a third solution of charging more for newspapers, but making the news more in depth, better quality. He admitted circulation would drop, but because newspapers would cost more, you might actually make a profit.

And how do you increase the quality? Well, for one, you need to spend more time rewriting, fact-checking, and backing-up sources. That means paying existing staff for more hours of labor. This also entails being less concerned about the pressure from deadlines. And it entails possibly hiring more staff to assist in researching.

Like Japanese car brands of Honda, Toyota, and Nissan that are more fuel efficient and simply made better as compared to the big-three American car brands of Ford, GM, and Chrysler, in jeopardy of bankruptcy, newspapers can learn a lesson: Better quality product means more sales.

But the recession is not to blame. Newspapers have been on a downward spiral ever since the advent of the Internet and the surge in popularity of blogs. All the recession did was speed up the process. And there’s no turning back. The Internet is here to stay.

Excuse me for not subscribing to the online version of any newspaper. I’m holding out as long as I've still got pocket change. I’m a sucker for the fresh scent and papery texture of a hard-copy newspaper.



Comments
#1 | Kutch on February 23 2009 23:58:38
Newspapers are dying out, everything is going to the internet now. Technology is the future, adjust or be left behind. I'd rather be able to get all different types of news anytime I want. Were in a new era, and more, and more things are becoming available on the internet. We are virtually becoming paperless.
#2 | Nathan on February 24 2009 10:53:46
I do agree that everything in going digital, but most of the news we get about faltering newspapers are from the major publications, which represent about 1,000 out of the 14,000 daily's that exist in the United States. Small community publications are not operating at a loss, and have actually seen increases in their profit margins. The owners of the major newspapers are, however, losing their as-es. We might not see these major newspapers trolling the earth anymore, but local-community publications are firmly entrenched in American society. We'll find a way to survive...
#3 | STOPTIMISTIC on February 24 2009 11:03:29
I love technology the only problem I have with technology is that it can crash and lose everything at least with hard copy you have proof and evidence. I don't like the whole idea of becoming paperless I believe our sources should come from every angle.
#4 | ethwc on February 24 2009 12:59:02
Actually, if you backup appropriately (especially important documents), loss of digital data is much less likely than paper data. With paper data, one generally has only one copy and, if burned, stolen, or otherwise destroyed, it is gone. With appropriate digital backup, one has several copies in various locations making permanent loss very unlikely. For example, medical data SHOULD be backed up daily to an off site source and monthly to a secure and safe off site location. In event of a worst case, one should never lose more than one month of data. In the old paper world, if the hospital had a fire, most data could be lost for ever.
#5 | vmohan123 on February 24 2009 23:56:01
What large newspapers wield over the Internet, at least for the time being, is a sense of credibility that smaller news websites can't hope to achieve yet. Years of longevity and readership serve to keep generations of loyal readers coming back time and time again. There is also enormous circulation of free dailies that are read and read again by people in metropolitan areas, like the Metro newspaper.

Of course, newspapers are still dying, though not as fast as one would expect. Newspapers and news broadcasters use the Internet mostly as a supplement to their main product. The Internet is the natural successor to newspapers, but there is still a generation of people not in tune with the Internet or computers in general.

Not surprisingly though, even the television/radio industry is taking a hit from the Internet. I earned a degree in broadcast journalism from Ryerson University just recently, but I could have gone for the newly created online journalism degree instead. Many of my colleagues who went for the online journalism stream are in the depths of their careers already.

Even worse off is magazine journalism, which is being crippled by economic circumstances. Here in Canada where I am, a lot of pretty reputable, long-lived magazines have gone under. Some magazines like TIME will undoubtedly weather the storm, due to being a fixture in so many lives, but many other niche magazines can't take the beating.
#6 | Yong Lee on February 27 2009 21:22:13
Interesting story, and another commentary on how the Internet continues to change things.

I read this opinion: although the Internet provides a platform for anyone to produce "news," the process followed by those in print journalism is actually more reliable. The story I read <http://www.salon.com/opinion/kamiya/2009/02/17/newspapers/index.html> cited that "What is really threatened by the decline of newspapers and the related rise of online media is reporting -- on-the-ground reporting by trained journalists who know the subject, have developed sources on all sides, strive for objectivity, and are working with editors who check their facts, steer them in the right direction and are a further check against the unwarrented assumptions, sloppy thinking and reporting , and conscious or unconscious bias."

I think it's a valid point -- I'm not a seasoned journalist, so I have to wonder how much of Internet news is gathered from print sources (where information is gathered from primary sources) and how much is gathered from Internet sources (which may in turn have been pulled from other Internet sources). So, what do y'all think? Is a story's integrity compromised due to the lack of actual reporting? If so, how can that be improved?
#7 | Tim Holland on February 28 2009 12:57:46
Some good points. As a subscriber to three newspapers, I'm a bit of a dinasour but there is a bigger problem with the internet and newspapers as well as cable news: they tend not to do original news reporting but rely on re-writing what they read in the paper or what is reported by others.

Cable news constantly refers to what the NY Times, Wall Street J. or Wash Post reported or pick up reports from regonal news papers have to say. No-one but print journalists or the major networks seem sot go to the original source any more. What we have is lazy news.
#8 | vmohan123 on February 28 2009 16:30:48
I think the fundamental quality behind good reporting hasn't really changed, and that is the element of human involvement. Despite the changes in medium, reporting is still people getting info from other people. At some point in time, someone had to talk to somebody to get whatever information is reported, whether or not the info is reproduced elsewhere.
#9 | John Neal on March 01 2009 06:49:54
Newspapers failed to take advantage of the Internet early on, and now it will cost them big. Shutting down presses and going on-line won't fix their big problem: making a profit. The Internet is an unproved business model when it comes to the news business. Advertisers won't pay as much for an Internet ad because they don't know the real affect of a "hit" or "click". If newspapers keep closing down, there will be a huge void in the news. Paid reporters who uncover news, not regurgitating the facts, won't be as likely to risk life and limb covering a war zone pro bono. The Washington Post has a great analysis following the shuttering of the Rocky Mountain News: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2009/02/28/ST2009022802422.html
#10 | Kazzo on March 12 2009 18:10:29
No doubt that newspapers are sinking everyday. Major (and also small) newspapers around the world understand, that the Internet news is the future.
Most of them joined this trend long time ago and nowadays they have very big and popular news websites on the web. It helps them to promote their newspapers and make very good income.
Post Comment
Please Login to Post a Comment.
Ratings
Rating is available to Members only.

Please login or register to vote.

No Ratings have been Posted.
Latest Articles
Last 10 Comments
Vanity Fair Journalist Bashes Sarah Palin in Scathing Article
13169 I am an English professor of over twenty years. I am published, no New York Times best seller, yet, but some of my stories are popular sellers. I enjoy a lot of inside connections within my writers - PurlGurl
Constitution and the Ground Zero Mosque
13132 Excellent piece. Thanks for taking the time to write it. - MplsVala
Sex on TV linked to teen pregnancy
7475 I too agree because The [u - jenifer111
ABC's 9-11 Movie
105 ABC is good channel. Its recently aired show[u - jenifer111
Newspapers vs. Internet
8877 I too agree with this point. Newspapers are no longer reliable and dying in their popularity. Internet is the fast pace medium to read the live news. I usually read about tv shows from here. I like in - jenifer111
Steven Slater: A Working-Class Hero?
13110 Well I guess same about it.. - jenifer111
Constitution and the Ground Zero Mosque
13132 Amen. I doubt very much that the writers intended for habeas corpus to be suspended while fighting a nebulous war against a criminal international group. Al Queda is an organization of evil doers bu - ethwc
E-Readers: Technologically Savvy or Just Lazy?
13143 One has choices for the device to be used. I, for one have refused to pay 300 or more for a reader and use my regular PC with software downloaded for free from Amazon. Literally thousands of books a - ethwc
Constitution and the Ground Zero Mosque
13132 Ed, I applaud your essay, I could not have said it better. I would add, however, that the Constitution DOES give the President the power to suspend habeus corpus in the cases of invasion or of insu - rwahrens
What To Do With Iran?
13133 Well Ethwc, it's going to be tough to deal with Iran now. What should have been done years ago was to allow Israel to go in there and bomb the nuclear plant while it was still being built. But - Anthony W Leone
Most Recent Opinion Pieces
Political Motives For Iraq Withdraw?
Attack On Muslim Cabbie Doesn’t Add Up
ABBEY ROAD:&#8232;Some Good Memories
What To Do With Iran?
Constitution and the Ground Zero Mosque
France to Expel Roma Amidst Mounting Criticism
Free Gaza
Can homegrown terrorism be stopped? Or is it a pipe dream?
Cal and the Tea Party
Government Motors (GM)
BP Hedges on Role of Relief Well in Gulf Oil Leak
Arizona's Immigration Law
Who Was the Real Hero of 1910 Bombing of The Los Angeles Times
Is Healthy Good for the Country?
Arizona, Immigration and Lack of Care
Book Review: An Irish Country Village
The beginning of the end for Chrysler
Is Netanyahu Blowing The Usual Smoke?
Why is the “The Twilight Saga” film series so popular?
Natural Disasters, Insurance and the Federal Government
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Adverts
Top Stories Past 7 Days
You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ')group by comment_item_id order by a desc limit 10' at line 1You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ')group by comment_item_id order by a desc limit 10' at line 1
You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ')group by comment_item_id order by a desc limit 10' at line 1