September 02 2010 16:54:28
Navigation
· Home
· Discussion Forum
· News Categories
· Staff Page
· Search
· RSS Feeds
· Ultimate Stat Page
· Links
· Contact
· Voice Your Opinion
News Feeds




Welcome
U.S.-Colombia Deal Sparks Criticism by UNASUR

Advert
World Politics Share
The United States and Colombia have agreed on a deal that will allow the U.S. military access to seven bases in the country of Colombia. There are currently 300 American troops already stationed in the South American country bordered by Venezuela, Brazil, Peru and Ecuador. An expansion of up to 800 U.S. soldiers and 600 civilian officials will be allowed under the deal that is expected to be in effect over the next 10 years.

Colombia’s neighbors and allies within UNASUR (Union of South American Nations) have vehemently expressed their concern for their continued right to sovereignty as independent nation states should there be any such U.S. intervention in Latin American politics. But Colombian President Alvaro Uribe has described his pact with the U.S. solely as strategic in his country’s battle against drug traffickers and insurgents. "We are not talking about a political game, we are talking about a threat that has spilled blood in Colombian society," President Uribe has stated.

Those in opposition have vocalized their concern towards President Uribe’s decision to allow U.S. access in his country. President Chavez of Venezuela has said, "The U.S. global strategy for domination explains the installation of these bases in Colombia."

"So now we're narcoterrorists. When they couldn't call us communists anymore, they called us subversives, and then traffickers, and since the September 11 attacks, terrorists. The history of Latin America repeats itself," chimed in Bolivian President Evo Morales.

Of the 12 countries allied within UNASUR, leaders have communicated that routine inspections of the U.S. bases be necessary and for the United States to promise not to further expand military presence. Such stipulations were visible when the leaders collectively stated in a signed declaration that what they wanted was to "reaffirm that the presence of foreign military forces must not menace the sovereignty and integrity of a South American country and in consequence regional peace and stability."
Comments
No Comments have been Posted.
Post Comment
Please Login to Post a Comment.
Ratings
Rating is available to Members only.

Please login or register to vote.

No Ratings have been Posted.
Latest Articles
Last 10 Comments
Vanity Fair Journalist Bashes Sarah Palin in Scathing Article
13169 I am an English professor of over twenty years. I am published, no New York Times best seller, yet, but some of my stories are popular sellers. I enjoy a lot of inside connections within my writers - PurlGurl
Constitution and the Ground Zero Mosque
13132 Excellent piece. Thanks for taking the time to write it. - MplsVala
Sex on TV linked to teen pregnancy
7475 I too agree because The [u - jenifer111
ABC's 9-11 Movie
105 ABC is good channel. Its recently aired show[u - jenifer111
Newspapers vs. Internet
8877 I too agree with this point. Newspapers are no longer reliable and dying in their popularity. Internet is the fast pace medium to read the live news. I usually read about tv shows from here. I like in - jenifer111
Steven Slater: A Working-Class Hero?
13110 Well I guess same about it.. - jenifer111
Constitution and the Ground Zero Mosque
13132 Amen. I doubt very much that the writers intended for habeas corpus to be suspended while fighting a nebulous war against a criminal international group. Al Queda is an organization of evil doers bu - ethwc
E-Readers: Technologically Savvy or Just Lazy?
13143 One has choices for the device to be used. I, for one have refused to pay 300 or more for a reader and use my regular PC with software downloaded for free from Amazon. Literally thousands of books a - ethwc
Constitution and the Ground Zero Mosque
13132 Ed, I applaud your essay, I could not have said it better. I would add, however, that the Constitution DOES give the President the power to suspend habeus corpus in the cases of invasion or of insu - rwahrens
What To Do With Iran?
13133 Well Ethwc, it's going to be tough to deal with Iran now. What should have been done years ago was to allow Israel to go in there and bomb the nuclear plant while it was still being built. But - Anthony W Leone
Most Recent Opinion Pieces
Political Motives For Iraq Withdraw?
Attack On Muslim Cabbie Doesn’t Add Up
ABBEY ROAD:
Some Good Memories
What To Do With Iran?
Constitution and the Ground Zero Mosque
France to Expel Roma Amidst Mounting Criticism
Free Gaza
Can homegrown terrorism be stopped? Or is it a pipe dream?
Cal and the Tea Party
Government Motors (GM)
BP Hedges on Role of Relief Well in Gulf Oil Leak
Arizona's Immigration Law
Who Was the Real Hero of 1910 Bombing of The Los Angeles Times
Is Healthy Good for the Country?
Arizona, Immigration and Lack of Care
Book Review: An Irish Country Village
The beginning of the end for Chrysler
Is Netanyahu Blowing The Usual Smoke?
Why is the “The Twilight Saga” film series so popular?
Natural Disasters, Insurance and the Federal Government
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Adverts
Top Stories Past 7 Days
You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ')group by comment_item_id order by a desc limit 10' at line 1You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ')group by comment_item_id order by a desc limit 10' at line 1
You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ')group by comment_item_id order by a desc limit 10' at line 1