September 02 2010 16:54:32
Navigation
· Home
· Discussion Forum
· News Categories
· Staff Page
· Search
· RSS Feeds
· Ultimate Stat Page
· Links
· Contact
· Voice Your Opinion
News Feeds




Welcome
Is government regulation of Big Tobacco a good thing?

Advert
Opinions Share
In a historic move, the Senate passed legislation yesterday that would allow the Food and Drug Administration to regulate certain aspects of the tobacco industry. All the bill needs to become a law is the signature of the president. While Obama has made good on some of his promises to regulate big business, I’m not convinced that this bill is the correct way to handle Big Tobacco.

Banks and insurance companies are entities that need to be regulated. There are dire consequences, as we’ve seen, to unsupervised spending and lending to those who are unqualified. Likewise, tobacco is a worldwide business. Its effects are far-reaching, but also impact many local economies. This issue, however, isn’t what I see as the major drawback to the government’s involvement.

As we’ve seen with the recent recalls of peanut and Chinese toys contaminated with lead, the FDA has a huge job. Every day, the agency receives more applications for approval of new products. Will the FDA be able to effectively manage and supervise the dealings of Phillip Morris and RJ Reynolds? I don’t think so.

The bill gives the FDA the right to nix advertisements if they seem to be appealing to children. The agency will also monitor the various substances and chemicals going into the product. This all sounds fine and dandy, but take a step back. The tobacco companies have been expecting such a move for some time now. (If the French managed to outlaw smoking, it was only a matter of time for us.) RJ Reynolds has been working on “safer” cigarettes and smokeless nicotine options for the past year in anticipation of this type of law.

Even the number one tobacco-producing state has smoking restrictions. North Carolina just passed a law outlawing smoking in bars and restaurants. Times are changing, and Big Tobacco is ready for the change, but I don’t think our government is well enough equipped to monitor their actions. What’s going to happen during the next time someone decides to sue a tobacco company? Will the government be held responsible?
Comments
#1 | rwahrens on June 12 2009 21:04:56
Is the government held responsible if someone sues a drug company?

No.

Same song, second verse.

FDA will organize an internal office to police this product, that's part of the bill. It will be funded by user fees paid by the industry, so your tax money won't be spent regulating this poisonous product.

Will it take time? Of course it will. Such things take time to organize. FDA was organized in 1906, after the first Food & Drug Act was passed, and it took decades to get it going properly.

Don't expect miracles in just a year or two. But make no bones about it, FDA WILL regulate this product, and we will do so vigorously.
#2 | MplsVala on June 13 2009 11:17:34
Well, we can legalize marijuana. All the coolest names have already been copyrighted by the big tobacco companies. That will give them a great new product just when they need it most.
#3 | scribbles on June 13 2009 21:41:59
Agreed. Don't think the government should be spending its much needed resources on trying to regulate drugs if there are so many other problems out there.
#4 | robertschwar on June 15 2009 09:26:48
I do tihnk the government should be doing this. This is what the FDA does, this is their job. good work.
#5 | DougM on June 15 2009 13:44:35
I think the editorial wasn't so much arguing that the government shouldn't regulate tobacco products as calling its ability to do so into question. Why that ability is being questioned is a little unclear to me. Yes, there will be slip-ups, as there have been with other products that the FDA deals with. Is that a good reason to throw our hands in the air and give up?

I actually think that the question of whether this regulation is the right thing to do is much more fruitful.
#6 | xzaria on June 24 2009 11:45:45
It's all about making the best of your health. Here is a web site that help, for smokers.www.simplystopsmoking.net
That is a small problem for Obama compared to what he is really handling but cigarettes is the hottest drug on the streets here in Chicago people will pay $1 for 1 cigarette thats hot!!
Post Comment
Please Login to Post a Comment.
Ratings
Rating is available to Members only.

Please login or register to vote.

No Ratings have been Posted.
Latest Articles
Last 10 Comments
Vanity Fair Journalist Bashes Sarah Palin in Scathing Article
13169 I am an English professor of over twenty years. I am published, no New York Times best seller, yet, but some of my stories are popular sellers. I enjoy a lot of inside connections within my writers - PurlGurl
Constitution and the Ground Zero Mosque
13132 Excellent piece. Thanks for taking the time to write it. - MplsVala
Sex on TV linked to teen pregnancy
7475 I too agree because The [u - jenifer111
ABC's 9-11 Movie
105 ABC is good channel. Its recently aired show[u - jenifer111
Newspapers vs. Internet
8877 I too agree with this point. Newspapers are no longer reliable and dying in their popularity. Internet is the fast pace medium to read the live news. I usually read about tv shows from here. I like in - jenifer111
Steven Slater: A Working-Class Hero?
13110 Well I guess same about it.. - jenifer111
Constitution and the Ground Zero Mosque
13132 Amen. I doubt very much that the writers intended for habeas corpus to be suspended while fighting a nebulous war against a criminal international group. Al Queda is an organization of evil doers bu - ethwc
E-Readers: Technologically Savvy or Just Lazy?
13143 One has choices for the device to be used. I, for one have refused to pay 300 or more for a reader and use my regular PC with software downloaded for free from Amazon. Literally thousands of books a - ethwc
Constitution and the Ground Zero Mosque
13132 Ed, I applaud your essay, I could not have said it better. I would add, however, that the Constitution DOES give the President the power to suspend habeus corpus in the cases of invasion or of insu - rwahrens
What To Do With Iran?
13133 Well Ethwc, it's going to be tough to deal with Iran now. What should have been done years ago was to allow Israel to go in there and bomb the nuclear plant while it was still being built. But - Anthony W Leone
Most Recent Opinion Pieces
Political Motives For Iraq Withdraw?
Attack On Muslim Cabbie Doesn’t Add Up
ABBEY ROAD:
Some Good Memories
What To Do With Iran?
Constitution and the Ground Zero Mosque
France to Expel Roma Amidst Mounting Criticism
Free Gaza
Can homegrown terrorism be stopped? Or is it a pipe dream?
Cal and the Tea Party
Government Motors (GM)
BP Hedges on Role of Relief Well in Gulf Oil Leak
Arizona's Immigration Law
Who Was the Real Hero of 1910 Bombing of The Los Angeles Times
Is Healthy Good for the Country?
Arizona, Immigration and Lack of Care
Book Review: An Irish Country Village
The beginning of the end for Chrysler
Is Netanyahu Blowing The Usual Smoke?
Why is the “The Twilight Saga” film series so popular?
Natural Disasters, Insurance and the Federal Government
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Adverts
Top Stories Past 7 Days
You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ')group by comment_item_id order by a desc limit 10' at line 1You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ')group by comment_item_id order by a desc limit 10' at line 1
You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ')group by comment_item_id order by a desc limit 10' at line 1